Sarah Van Emst vs Loes Ebeling Koning Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Performance on second serve: Koning has a 39.51% win rate on their second serve points, while Emst is slightly ahead with 40.73%. Does this give Emst an edge?
• Return game strength: Koning has been successful in winning 52.26% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Emst's 51.88% success rate.
• First serve return comparison: Emst outperforms Koning with a 34.01% win rate on first serve returns, while Koning holds a 31.31% win rate. Could this be a decisive factor?
• Pressure situations: Both players have saved 45.49% of breakpoints recently, indicating similar resilience under pressure.
• Match-winning ability: Koning has a slightly higher match win rate of 63.64% over the past year, compared to Emst’s 62.75%. Will this translate into a victory?
• Surface preference: Koning excels on clay with a 66% win rate, while Emst is strongest on hard courts with a 71% win rate.
• Player level experience: Both have played primarily at the $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF level, with Koning having a slightly better win rate of 66.67% compared to Emst's 63.89%.
• Head-to-head record: Koning leads their head-to-head encounters, having won the only match between them previously.
• Tiebreak performance: Emst has won the only tiebreak played between them, which could be crucial in critical moments.
• Opponent quality: Koning has faced stronger opponents ranked around 335.27 on average, while Emst's opponents averaged a rank of 407.22.
• Deciding set performance: Koning excels in deciding sets, winning 56% compared to Emst's 31% win rate.
• Breakpoint conversion: Koning converts 44.89% of breakpoints, slightly better than Emst who converts 44.12%.

Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):

As Koning and Emst prepare to face off, several factors favor Koning for this match. While Emst has shown a marginally stronger performance on second serves, Koning's edge in returning second serves might counterbalance this.

Their head-to-head record also leans towards Koning, who is undefeated against Emst in previous encounters. If the match extends into a deciding set, statistics also favor Koning due to a stronger performance rate than Emst.

Although both players are equally adept at saving breakpoints, Koning’s stronger opposition quality and superior win rate on their preferred surface gives them an additional advantage.

Considering these elements, Koning is the probable winner in the upcoming tennis match against Emst.